forum.lex.bg

Как да предпазя Ексклузивното си представителство от съмнителни стоки?
Sobstvenik i upravitel sam na firma S Line OOD , koiato se zanimava s vnos na visokotehnologichni i skapi med. i kozm.aparaturi. Exclusiven predstavitel sam na markata GSD PTF za Bulgaria- ZA KOETO IMAM I SAOTVETNITE DOGOVORI ZA PREDSTAVITELSTVO . Ot skoro na pazara se poiavi aparat sas sashtata marka - neznaino otkade dostaven - no, ne i ot proizvoditelia . Opaseniata sa mi dali tozi produkt otgovaria po tehnicheski harakteristiki i bezopastnost , kakto originalnia

/s nego se tretitar liza i dr., vazmojni sa igariania / t.e. pritesnena sam ot poiavata na tozi aparat
i ot antireklamata, koito bi mogla da stane ZA MOIA SMETKA. Oshte poveche - MISLIA, CHE VNOSITELIAT NA TOZI APARAT NIAMA PRAVO DA PRAVI TARGOVIA S NEGO - KATO GO OTDAVA - I TO BEZ SAOTVETNITE DOKUMENTI - NA RAZLICHNI KOZMETICHNI SALONI POD NAEM . Edinsvenoto, koeto uspiah da naucha, che tova se izvarhva ot kozmetichka Anelia......GSM 0895436937.

MOLIA Vi , poiasnete kakvo bi sledvalo da napravia ot tuk natam i kakva bi mogla da e Vashata namesa i podkrepa v sluchaia.

Predvaritelno Vi blagodaria i se nadiavam na pomosht.

S nai-slanchevi pojelania :

S Line EXCLUSIVE GSD PTF

Irena Ivanova

0887095990

http://www.s-linebg.com

Уважаема госпожо, проблемът Ви е достатъчно сериозен и е необходимо да се разгледа адвокат! Тук във форума, без да сме видели документите, които имате няма как да Ви насочим. Има начини за противодействие разбира се, но следва да се изясни цялата ситуация!

Така е по принцип:

Case law on parallel imports
The 1998 European Court of Justice (ECJ) judgment in the Silhouette case sets out the basis for parallel imports. This judgment was the meaning of the European Directive on Trademarks (89/104/EC.) It set out that trade mark law does not create rights to control imports between Member States of goods already placed on the market in the European Union (EU).

However, it does give a right to prevent importation into the EU if these goods have been marketed elsewhere (so-called Community exhaustion of rights). The ECJ found that Member States cannot introduce or maintain systems such as that of "international exhaustion." International exhaustion would be a system in which first sale anywhere in the world would allow their later import into the EU .

There have been further references to the ECJ for parallel imports, most recently Tesco's v. Levi's (C-414/99, C-415/99, C-416/99), Zino Davidoff SA v. A&G Imports Ltd, Levi Strauss & Co and Levi Strauss (UK) Ltd v. Tesco Stores, Tesco plc and Costco Wholesale UK Ltd). The Judgement in this case was delivered on 20th November 2001.

А за конкретния случай може и да се прилага групово освобождаване, но това бихте могли да уточните с адвокат.